Poster Sat, Apr 25, 2026 • 11:15 AM – 1:45 PM PDT Pavilion 3 P3-#1206

ACADREASON: Exploring the Limits of Reasoning Models with Academic Research Problems

Xin Gui ⋅ Zhu ⋅ JinCheng Ren ⋅ Qianben Chen ⋅ Zekun Wang ⋅ Yizhi Li ⋅ Xinpeng Liu ⋅ Wallis_Wenli Ren ⋅ Linyu Miao ⋅ Tianrui Qin ⋅ Ziqi Shu ⋅ He Zhu ⋅ Dingfeng Shi ⋅ JIAHENG LIU ⋅ Yuchen Jiang ⋅ Minghao Liu ⋅ Ge Zhang ⋅ Wangchunshu Zhou

Abstract

In recent years, the research focus of large language models (LLMs) and agents has shifted increasingly from demonstrating novel capabilities to complex reasoning and tackling challenging tasks. However, existing evaluations focus mainly on math/code contests or general tasks, while existing multi-domain academic benchmarks lack sufficient reasoning depth, leaving the field without a rigorous benchmark for high-level reasoning. To fill this gap, we introduce the ACADREASON benchmark, designed to evaluate the ability of LLMs and agents to acquire and reason over academic knowledge. It consists of 50 expert-annotated academic problems across five high-reasoning domains, including computer science, economics, law, mathematics, and philosophy. All questions are sourced from top-tier publications in recent years and undergo rigorous annotation and quality control to ensure they are both challenging and answerable. We conduct systematic evaluations over 10 mainstream LLMs and agents. The results show that most LLMs scored below 20 points, with even the cutting-edge GPT-5 achieving only 16 points. While agents achieved higher scores, none exceeded 40 points. This demonstrates the current capability gap between LLMs and agents in super-intelligent academic research tasks and highlights the challenges of ACADREASON. The code and data for the ACADREASON benchmark are available at https://github.com/OPPO-PersonalAI/Acadreason-benchmark.