Meta-Router: Bridging Gold-standard and Preference-based Evaluations in LLM Routing

In language tasks requiring extensive human-model interaction, the inference cost of large language models (LLMs) can be substantial. To reduce expenses while preserving the quality of the responses, an LLM router selects among candidate models to balance between the expected response quality and the inference cost. A central challenge in router training is the accuracy and accessibility of reliable supervision. Gold-standard data, obtained from domain experts or benchmark labels, provide accurate quality evaluations of LLM responses but are costly and difficult to scale. In contrast, preference-based data, collected via crowdsourcing or LLM-as-a-judge systems, are cheaper and more scalable, yet often biased in reflecting the true quality of responses. We cast the problem of LLM router training with combined Gold-standard and preference-based data into a causal inference framework by viewing the response evaluation mechanism as the treatment assignment. This perspective further reveals that the bias in preference-based data corresponds to the well-known causal estimand: the conditional average treatment effect (CATE). Based on this new perspective, we develop an integrative causal router training framework that corrects preference-data bias, addresses imbalances between two data sources, and improves routing robustness and efficiency. Numerical experiments demonstrate that our approach delivers more accurate routing and improves the trade-off between cost and quality.