Structured Reasoning for LLMs: A Unified Framework for Efficiency and Explainability

Recent Large Language Models (LLMs) have made remarkable progress, but they still struggle with complex reasoning tasks such as logical deduction and planning. This is partly because they rely primarily on token-level probability relationships, which limits their ability to reason effectively. In this paper, inspired by cognitive science and neurosymbolic AI, we introduce Structured Reasoning, which aimes at enhancing the reasoning capabilities of LLMs from the step level. To this end, we first collect high‑frequency, domain‑agnostic reasoning step tags and construct a structured reasoning dataset with those tags. Then, we treat a reasoning process as a directed acyclic graph, where the vertices represent steps and the edges indicate the direction of reasoning. In this context, an efficient reasoning process corresponds to, or can be characterized by, a sparse reasoning graph. To construct reasoning graphs, we introduce structured tags for reliable step extraction from LLM outputs. For single-graph optimization, we propose the MaxFlow reward, which rewards graphs with balanced node contributions and fewer redundant steps. The quality of a sparse reasoning graph can be reflected by the total flow from all steps to the final answer. For multi-graph comparison, we propose the LCS reward, which selects reliable reasoning paths by identifying optimal common subsequences (consecutive steps) shared across multiple generated responses (sequences). Experiments with DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B and 7B models show that our method consistently outperforms GRPO and other carefully tuned baselines across various context lengths (0.5k–8k). Structured Reasoning shows particular strength in efficiency (better performance with fewer steps) and stability (consistently generating high-quality outputs across a temperature range of 0.1 to 1.0). Methods and examples is currently available on our website: https://cnsdqd-dyb.github.io/structured-reasoning.