Code generation is a crucial research area in the field of artificial intelligence, holding the potential to revolutionize software development and streamline programming processes. However, generating the high-performance code, which need to be executed in a shorter time for the low-latency scenario, remains a formidable challenge. Existing methods often struggle to account for the irregularity of input sparse data in sparse programs and the need for domain-specific architectural knowledge, leading to sub-optimal performance. To tackle these issues, we propose the SparseRL framework. SparseRL leverages deep reinforcement learning, treating a pre-trained language model as a stochastic policy. It takes the row and column indices of non-zero elements in the sparse matrix as input and generates CUDA code as output for sparse matrix operations. We also introduce a domain-specific code generation mechanism for the dynamic input, a sinusoidal embedding technique tailored for sparse matrices, and a hierarchical reward function that considers both code correctness and execution efficiency. Experimental results demonstrate SparseRL achieves state-of-the-art performance. In sparse matrix-vector multiplication (SpMV) tasks, it improves the compilation rate by 20% compared to existing methods, and the generated code runs 30% faster on average. For sparse matrix-dense matrix multiplication (SpMM) tasks, SparseRL also shows significant performance gains. These results highlight the effectiveness of SparseRL in generating high-performance CUDA code for sparse matrix operations.

Probabilistic programming offers a powerful framework for modeling uncertainty, yet statistical model discovery in this domain entails navigating an immense search space under strict domain‐specific constraints. When small language models are tasked with generating probabilistic programs, they frequently produce outputs that suffer from both syntactic, and semantic errors, such as flawed inference constructs. Motivated by probabilistic programmers’ domain expertise and debugging strategies, we introduce RefineStat, a language model–driven framework that enforces semantic constraints ensuring synthesized programs contain valid distributions, well‐formed parameters, and then applies diagnostic‐aware refinement by resampling prior or likelihood components whenever reliability checks fail. We evaluate RefineStat on multiple probabilistic-programming code-generation tasks using smaller language models (SLMs) and find that it produces programs that are both syntactically sound and statistically reliable, often matching or surpassing those from closed-source large language models (e.g., OpenAI o3).

Recent studies operationalize self-improvement through coding agents that edit their own codebases. They grow a tree of self-modifications through expansion strategies that favor higher software engineering benchmark performance, assuming that this implies more promising subsequent self-modifications. However, we identify a mismatch between the agent’s self-improvement potential (metaproductivity) and its coding benchmark performance, namely the Metaproductivity-Performance~Mismatch. Inspired by Huxley’s concept of clade, we propose a metric ($\mathrm{CMP}$) that aggregates the benchmark performances of the descendants of an agent as an indicator of its potential for self-improvement. We show that, in our self-improving coding agent development setting, access to the true CMP is sufficient to simulate how the Gödel Machine would behave under certain assumptions. We introduce the Huxley-G\"odel Machine (HGM), which, by estimating $\mathrm{CMP}$ and using it as guidance, searches the tree of self-modifications. On SWE-bench Verified and Polyglot, HGM outperforms prior self-improving coding agent development methods while using fewer allocated CPU hours. Last but not least, HGM demonstrates strong transfer to other coding datasets and LLMs. %large language models. The agent optimized by HGM on SWE-bench Verified with GPT-5 mini and evaluated on SWE-bench Lite with GPT-5 achieves human-level performance, matching the best officially checked results of human-engineered coding agents. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/metauto-ai/HGM.

Modern AI algorithms increasingly adopt fused kernels for performance, but implementing them remains complex due to the lack of fine-grained control in existing compilers like Triton. We introduce TileLang, a controllable programming system for fused neural kernels. TileLang provides explicit tile-level primitives for memory placement, data movement, and parallel scheduling. To guide developers in hardware-aware programming, the TileLang introduces two key techniques: tile inference which models tile programs as fused graphs and automatically deduces tile configuration from partial annotations; and tile recommendation that suggests efficient tile configurations based on hardware profiles and heuristics. TileLang makes it easy to express a wide range of fused attention kernels in under 80 lines of Python code, reducing code size by up to 90% compared to manual implementations. Evaluations show that TileLang achieves up to 5x speedup over Triton on NVIDIA H100 and up to 6 on AMD GPUs, demonstrating its ability to bridge programmability and performance.

Evaluating tabular generators remains a challenging problem, as the unique causal structural prior of heterogeneous tabular data does not lend itself to intuitive human inspection. Recent work has introduced structural fidelity as a tabular-specific evaluation dimension to assess whether synthetic data complies with the causal structures of real data. However, existing benchmarks often neglect the interplay between structural fidelity and conventional evaluation dimensions, thus failing to provide a holistic understanding of model performance. Moreover, they are typically limited to toy datasets, as quantifying existing structural fidelity metrics requires access to ground-truth causal structures, which are rarely available for real-world datasets. In this paper, we propose a novel evaluation framework that jointly considers structural fidelity and conventional evaluation dimensions. We introduce a new evaluation metric, global utility, which enables the assessment of structural fidelity even in the absence of ground-truth causal structures. In addition, we present TabStruct, a comprehensive evaluation benchmark offering large-scale quantitative analysis on 13 tabular generators from nine distinct categories, across 29 datasets. Our results demonstrate that global utility provides a task-independent, domain-agnostic lens for tabular generator performance. We release the TabStruct benchmark suite, including all datasets, evaluation pipelines, and raw results. Code is available at https://github.com/SilenceX12138/TabStruct.