Skip to yearly menu bar Skip to main content


In-Person Poster presentation / top 5% paper

Modeling content creator incentives on algorithm-curated platforms

Jiri Hron · Karl Krauth · Michael Jordan · Niki Kilbertus · Sarah Dean

MH1-2-3-4 #144

Keywords: [ producer incentives ] [ exposure game ] [ recommenders ] [ differentiable games ] [ attention monetizing platforms ] [ Nash equilibria ] [ Theory ]


Abstract:

Content creators compete for user attention. Their reach crucially depends on algorithmic choices made by developers on online platforms. To maximize exposure, many creators adapt strategically, as evidenced by examples like the sprawling search engine optimization industry. This begets competition for the finite user attention pool. We formalize these dynamics in what we call an exposure game, a model of incentives induced by modern algorithms including factorization and (deep) two-tower architectures. We prove that seemingly innocuous algorithmic choices—e.g., non-negative vs. unconstrained factorization—significantly affect the existence and character of (Nash) equilibria in exposure games. We proffer use of creator behavior models like ours for an (ex-ante) pre-deployment audit. Such an audit can identify misalignment between desirable and incentivized content, and thus complement post-hoc measures like content filtering and moderation. To this end, we propose tools for numerically finding equilibria in exposure games, and illustrate results of an audit on the MovieLens and LastFM datasets. Among else, we find that the strategically produced content exhibits strong dependence between algorithmic exploration and content diversity, and between model expressivity and bias towards gender-based user and creator groups.

Chat is not available.