Advances in large language models (LLM) have produced text that appears increasingly human-like and difficult to detect with the human eye. In order to mitigate the impact of misusing LLM-generated texts, e.g., copyright infringement, fair student assessment, fraud, and other societally harmful LLM usage, a line of work on detecting human and LLM-written text has been explored. While recent work has focused on classifying entire text samples (e.g., paragraphs) as human or LLM-written, this paper investigates a more realistic setting of mixed-text, where the text's individual segments (e.g., sentences) could each be written by either a human or an LLM. A text encountered in practical usage cannot generally be assumed to be fully human or fully LLM-written; simply predicting whether it is human or LLM-written is insufficient as it does not provide the user with full context on its origins, such as the amount of LLM-written text, or locating the LLM-written parts. Therefore, we study two relevant problems in the mixed-text setting: (i) estimating the percentage of a text that was LLM-written, and (ii) determining which segments were LLM-written. To this end, we propose Partial-LLM Detector (PaLD), a black-box method that leverages the scores of text classifiers. Experimentally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of PaLD compared to baseline methods that build on existing LLM text detectors.