Multi-armed bandits (MAB) are commonly used in sequential online decision-making when the reward of each decision is an unknown random variable. In practice, however, the typical goal of maximizing total reward may be less important than minimizing the total cost of the decisions taken, subject to a reward constraint. For example, we may seek to make decisions that have at least the reward of a reference default'' decision. This problem was recently introduced in the Multi-Armed Bandits with Cost Subsidy (MAB-CS) framework. MAB-CS is broadly applicable to problem domains where a primary metric (cost) is constrained by a secondary metric (reward), and there is an inability to explicitly determine the trade-off between these metrics. In our work, we first introduce the Pairwise-Elimination algorithm for a simplified variant of the cost subsidy problem with a known reference arm. We then generalize PE to PE-CS to solve the MAB-CS problem in the setting where the reference arm is the un-identified optimal arm. Next, we analyze the performance of both PE and PE-CS on the dual metrics of Cost and Quality Regret. Our instance-dependent analysis of PE and PE-CS reveals that both algorithms have an order-wise logarithmic upper bound on Cost and Quality Regret, making our policy the first with such a guarantee. Finally, experiments are conducted using the MovieLens 25M dataset for both PE and PE-CS and using a synthetic toy experiment for PE-CS revealing that our method invariably outperforms the ETC-CS baseline from the literature.