Pursuing Better Decision Boundaries for Long-Tailed Object Detection via Category Information Amount

In object detection, the number of instances is commonly used to determine whether a dataset follows a long-tailed distribution, implicitly assuming that the model will perform poorly on categories with fewer instances. This assumption has led to extensive research on category bias in datasets with imbalanced instance distributions. However, even in datasets with relatively balanced instance counts, models still exhibit bias toward certain categories, indicating that instance count alone cannot explain this phenomenon. In this work, we first introduce the concept and measurement of category informativeness. We observe a significant negative correlation between a category’s informativeness and its accuracy, suggesting that informativeness more accurately reflects the learning difficulty of a category. Based on this observation, we propose the Informativeness-Guided Angular Margin Loss (IGAM Loss), which dynamically adjusts the decision space of categories according to their informativeness, thereby mitigating category bias in long-tailed datasets. IGAM Loss not only achieves superior performance on long-tailed benchmark datasets such as LVIS v1.0 and COCO-LT but also demonstrates significant improvements for underrepresented categories in non-long-tailed datasets like Pascal VOC. Extensive experiments confirm the potential of category informativeness as a tool and the generalizability of our proposed method.