Let Your Features Tell The Differences: Understanding Graph Convolution By Feature Splitting

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in processing structured data. While traditional GNNs typically treat each feature dimension equally important during graph convolution, we raise an important question: **Is the graph convolution operation equally beneficial for each feature?** If not, the convolution operation on certain feature dimensions can possibly lead to harmful effects, even worse than convolution-free models. Therefore, it is required to distinguish convolution-favored and convolution-disfavored features. Traditional feature selection methods mainly focus on identifying informative features or reducing redundancy, but they are not suitable for structured data as they overlook graph structures. In graph community, some studies have investigated the performance of GNN with respect to node features using feature homophily metrics, which assess feature consistency across graph topology. Unfortunately, these metrics do not effectively align with GNN performance and cannot be reliably used for feature selection in GNNs. To address these limitations, we introduce a novel metric, Topological Feature Informativeness (TFI), to distinguish GNN-favored and GNN-disfavored features, where its effectiveness is validated through both theoretical analysis and empirical observations. Based on TFI, we propose a simple yet effective Graph Feature Selection (GFS) method, which processes GNN-favored and GNN-disfavored features with GNNs and non-GNN models separately. Compared to original GNNs, GFS significantly improves the extraction of useful topological information from each feature with comparable computational costs. Extensive experiments show that after applying GFS to $\textbf{8}$ baseline and state-of-the-art (SOTA) GNN architectures across $\textbf{10}$ datasets, $\textbf{90\%}$ of the GFS-augmented cases show significant performance boosts. Furthermore, our proposed TFI metric outperforms other feature selection methods for GFS. These results verify the effectiveness of both GFS and TFI. Additionally, we demonstrate that GFS's improvements are robust to hyperparameter tuning, highlighting its potential as a universally valid method for enhancing various GNN architectures.